Saturday, 1 April 2017


The following is the unedited version of an exposé currently featured in the 19th revised edition of Malleus Maleficus'  [title withheld] *** (see below): If you wish to report intrusiveness, defamation or inaccuracies, please email  To make a formal complaint under IPSO rules please contact IPSO directly at . 
"We shot an amazing number of people!" 
General  Stanley McCrystal
"Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everybody you meet!"  
General Mad Dog Mattis

            While it seems beyond question that the proliferation of firearms in the past decade or two has  made it possible to kill more people in less time, some experts have attributed a spike in the world’s armed confrontations to  the rate of growth in the world population.     By the middle of this century there will be an extra 2.3 billion humans  with a choke-hold on the world’s energy supply, and contraceptive military correctives (CMC) would have to rise by 40% to meet demand for Lebensraum, according to an unofficial briefing by an ISD executive, seen by this author.[1]  The military objectives remain unidentified, but a declassified NSA report filed a month later suggested  that both,  the Institute for Strategic Dialogue and the House Committee on Homeland Security believe that the “contraceptive  cause”  required an unflinching commitment to military correctives.
The number of victims is hard to estimate,  but with its 2,000-mile shared border, Mexico is presently the biggest supplier of CMCs. To say nothing of those hundreds of thousands fleeing the murderous triangle of Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador, while tens of thousands of militias and marines cull the cartels, turning the drug war from a real armed conflict into a vehicle for CMC. 
The only countries other than Mexico and the US known to be implementing CMC - according to the Geneva-based Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue - are all in Asia. An estimated 7,000 Filipinos have been killed amid mounting calls for in investigation by the International Criminal Court in Duterte's "War on Drugs" alone. But you will look in vain for a UN investigation into "unlawful killings and other violations" in the context of CMC. This notwithstanding, my White House sources tell me "contraceptive military culling" is very much on the table. As a West Wing staffer phrased it after the conservative Judicial Watch secured the release of supplementary info through the Freedom of Information Act; "CMC is merely, as far as I can say, a small cog in a global killing machine." Albeit a killing machine which few people are conscious of. Whereas Trump's embrace of Turkey's Tayyip Erdogan, Egypt's Abdul Fattah al-Sisi, and the Philippines Rodrigo Duterte suggests a growing empathy with contraceptive military correctives, it is likely  that Barack Obama’s speech of   Dec. 1st., 2015 - in the aftermath of the Paris massacre - was grounded in meanings independent of matters of CO2. “If we let the world’s population keep rising as fast as it is, and living spaces diminishing as fast as they are,” - and I’m decrypting the surrogate argument that the root of all our troubles is ‘climate change’[3]   - “...than before long, we are going to have to devote more and more and more of our military resources to adapting to the demographic consequences of a congested planet.” Indeed, events of which nobody is in control  are always compatible with their own momentum, and it is by an entirely ‘causal’ process that the killing of human beings will be a major global industry in a decade or two.
The sub-prime boom that triggered the 2008 financial crash began as a mathematical abstraction.  
The implication here being that once the logical consistency of boom and bust is introduced, both sides of the equation become well-defined quantities. Nor is this  a hypothetical scenario. While the frequency of terrorism offences has roughly doubled since 2010, a report on Isis-run schools in Iraq and Syria reveals that children are being asked to calculate the quantity of Shi-‘ite Muslims or “unbelievers” that can be killed by a single suicide bomber. Then, an Isis terrorist blows himself up in Sehwan, Pakistan, killing at least 75 people. You can keep looking at different scenarios if you like, but all that this means is that demographic reasoning, theorems and mathematics, or what Isis calls "the Prophetic methodology" can be reduced to solutions and properties. Add to this the volatility of some political systems and the population explosion – which has seen some countries double their population in the past 25 years – and you have the compound mathematics of belligerent politics, frustrated growth, archaic views on contraception, and a toxic surplus of rutting young males.[4] Which is the state of the system prior to measurement. All without ever answering the obvious question: why does the world cling to its redundant image of eco-demographic growth? Quite simply, Not only because it's reassuring, but because it is too difficult to accept the truth of what has since come to replace it; and because the very people qualified to spell it out for you have no interest in
humanity and see no need for doing so. 

        China's one-child policy was conceived by military scientists. And the purpose of this memo is, of course, to defy a deep and confused hypocrisy. Future historians may struggle to decide which was the more equitable: death or renewal, but I see no reason why the application of
quantitative mathematics to the business of culling  -  of which military correctives are only a part – should be ethically unacceptable and therefore treated with silence and audience disconnection. The surplus population, or its regional excess, has to be paired in other words; any other possibility would be an act of wishful thinking at best, or at worst,  of bogus appeasement.[5]
Maybe it is ignored there, or maybe these military correctives are knock-on functions of the way we live in developed countries,  but the balance is shifting. A recent pledge by Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iran’s supreme leader, actually undertook to boost the nation’s population from 77m to 150m within 50 years. Africans may have built  small mountains out of human corpses, but Nigeria’s population alone will have risen from 38m in 1952, to nearly 400m by 2050. As indeed, the most divisive and disturbing disparity in the world at this moment isn’t global ecology, it’s screwed up national ideology. Thus, Jonathan Last, the American author of What To Expect When No One’s Expecting, proclaims that “The root cause of most of our problems is our declining fertility rate. If we want to continue leading the world,” he says, “we simply must figure out a way to have more babies.”
            And there you have it: Some forms of idiocy are circumstantial perhaps, but considerable nevertheless...

[1] Meanwhile,   the conservative  foundation Judicial Watch has filed a lawsuit against the US State Department to force the release of “documents related to projected CMCs”,  also the subject of a freedom of information request first lodged in 2012.
[2] The NSA declined to comment.
[3] “If we let the world keep warming as fast as it is, and sea levels rising   as fast as they are,”-  in the actual words of the President - “...than before long, we are going to have to devote more and more and more of our economic and military resources.... to adapting to the various consequences of a changing planet.”
[4] In the Middle East over 40% of the population is under 25.
[5] The US defence department, meanwhile,  has openly stated its intention to develop autonomous “Terminator” weapons systems that can kill without human intervention.

Re.: "Pending  further inquiries, no court, justice, or judge shall have jurisdiction to hear or consider any claim or cause of action whatsoever relating to the prosecution, trial, or judgment of Malleus Maleficus,  including challenges to the lawfulness of the opinions expressed under this title: ***


Magdalena V. said...

To someone used to the reassurance of the American legal system, I’m seriously alarmed!!! The quicker the problem of excessive immigration can be uncoupled from hysterical racial rhetoric, the more likely we are to address the real problem: Overpopulation!

G. D. Robinson said...

And there it is. We have the ground zero calamity: CMC! Signs and secret symbols decipherable only by the initiated. Can anyone shed a light on this...??